“Ma’am, I’m afraid this bathroom is for women only,” the inspector says. “I’m a woman,” McBride replies. “What I mean is that it is reserved for ‘biological women,’” the inspector replies. “It’s not on the door,” McBride replies. “Did you check everyone or just wait for me?”
Let’s omit the first case. Being transgender is not a crime. The idea of putting anyone on a toilet registration list is crazier than a payday at a peanut farm.
Nor will Congress implement uniform gender controls for restroom use. I am perplexed about the screening process that determines which women need to show their genitals to the nurse. Do we ask them to immediately estimate the relative size of the Adam’s apple? Maybe we screen all women who are taller than the average American female height of 5’10”? My wife is several inches above that threshold, and I can’t imagine anyone brave enough to stand between her and the bathroom when nature calls. Everyone likes TSA spot checks at the airport…never said anyone.
All of this congressional bathroom business is essentially about expressing views on gender identity.
The right response to speech that upsets us is to talk more. We should not legislate to enforce our views. Conservatives who cannot abide hate speech laws, college speech codes, and other government-mandated speech should not do the same by passing laws and rules they do not want to enforce.
Johnson defended the bathroom regulations and also noted, “Women deserve women-only spaces.” But what about the men who suddenly find transgender women in their bathrooms? How do we know women aren’t sneaking into our restrooms to take a look? Should we just accept that every person who presents as female in our restrooms and locker rooms was assigned male at birth? And don’t tell me that no woman would ever go into the men’s room, you sexist.
So I suspect we’ll have to use an anatomy screen for the men’s room too.
Have the gender debate, but don’t cancel each other out
Put the argument in the context of another problem. Conservatives would lose their minds if Trump’s promise to enforce immigration law was limited to a resolution saying that people here without legal status cannot stay in America.
Why? Immigration law can actually be consistently enforced. That hasn’t been the case in recent administrations, but a majority of Americans want to see such laws upheld rather than ignored.
On the other hand, I can’t imagine that the majority of Americans would want to expose their genitals to enforce gender regulations in restrooms and locker rooms. We have numerous criminal laws in place if someone, regardless of gender, commits crimes in the toilet.
America needs a vigorous, open debate about gender issues, and we appear to be doing just that. Neither side of this debate should be able to silence or cancel the other side.
To McBride’s credit, the freshman congressman dismissed the bathroom business as annoying noise. “I’m not here to argue about bathrooms. “I’m here to fight for Delawareans and reduce costs for families,” McBride said on X. “Like all members, I will follow the rules laid out by Speaker Johnson, even if I disagree with them.”
We need fewer laws and regulations. We shouldn’t create new ones until we consistently enforce the ones we already have. Conservatives in particular should understand this. Congress should focus more on immigration, inflation and preventing World War III than on who sits next to them in the booth.
USA TODAY Network Tennessee columnist Cameron Smith is a Memphis-born, Brentwood-raised political lawyer who worked for conservative Republicans. He and his wife, Justine, are raising three boys in Nolensville, Tennessee. Direct outrage or agreement to smith.david.cameron@gmail.com or @DCameronSmith on X, formerly known as Twitter. Agree or disagree? Send a letter to the editor to letters@tennessean.com .