Diego Vázquez faces the duel between Motagua and Olimpia

Diego VazquezDirector técnico del Motaguanot okultó su malestar tras el score 1-1 ante Olimpia The basic requirement is the final of the Torneo Apertura 2024 de la National League of Honduras.

The Argentine strategy is to link its contents to the arbitrary decision of the party and to make various decisions that it must make in its juice in the final moments of the encounter.

During the press conference, Vazquez When it comes to labor arbitration violations, certain incidents such as the Mano in the region need to be taken into account Jonathan Paz There is no Sancionada and no Codazo Rubilio Castillo que quedó sin castigo. Además, que these situations no son aisladas, sino parte of a patron period que, según él, beneficia to Olimpia.

The technician has instructed the magazines to report these irregularities and confirmed that they have not agreed with the decision and the result of the parties.

On the other hand, the strategy is very autocritical to evaluate the operation of their equipment, although admitting that one cannot take the first step and that the first time sent the rival to the earth. Without an embargo, the importance of gold will be destroyed Agustin AuzmendiQuien rompió su sequía goleadora ante Olympiaand make sure you are confident that your team can turn the situation around at the end of the race.

Jonathan Núñez’s attention is as follows: “It’s a player to mix, so we have to get going and he has amazed the time he has on the way.” “Our content is because we have another option in this position have”.

About Jonathan Paz’s Mano and the arbitration issue: “They decided to trust us (personalities) because they were away for so long. In the area where they play basketball, I have to ask them. When I started it was a maneuver, an offside position that wasn’t a game and a shot that Rubilio finished with a codazo on the pitch and the decision came to mind and was like nada. It’s unbelievable that a man had no business in the area when he passed by. It is difficult to deal with the issue without there being a precedent, or to instruct the tribunal or instruct the commission to do what should be done. Jack Rodríguez raises the Bandera system; You believed it was Jack when you told him he would help you. It’s terrible and unfortunate. Después, el hijo de Salinas, que todos saben de qué color es. It’s unbelievable.”

Are you satisfied with the result? “No, you know more. There is no part in the part and there is no difference in the result. Part of it defended a moment later, and it took a long time to paradoxically see more Adele, although he also represented the rival’s merit. The second year we were in a higher position and finished with a good portion, but they could be better.”

Consider arbitration in Olimpia: “Hasta cuándo va a seguir pasando? I just want to say that this is ambiguous for all programs. Is this ambiguous for everything? ¿Qué es lo que ven? What did you ask? Don’t want to comment? We have to minimize them, they have to settle for one issue, and they give a lot of clarity about which parties define them. Después escucho hablar cualquier cosa. I met with the participants in the final moments and ended up in the psychiatric ward. I explain the maneuvers, escape the pelota and dismount with the maneuvers. Not for us or others. The action of Palacios a Arboleda corresponds exactly to what José García did in Auzmendi and for a person who does not know the Pitan and the other. No, I made that up, it’s exactly the right thing, but if you’re doing him a favor, and if you’re doing him a favor, then that’s not the case.”

Are you on the safe side? In the last final it was also said: “In the semi-final a penalty was given when Bengtson received Luis Vega and did not stop. You can’t do that, but you still have to comment. This means I have to be careful about making it ambiguous for everything, but it’s not that simple. All they have to do is change the colors and lines that the world knows, and they haven’t succeeded. If you say so, I’m Castigan. “Creo que no dije nada sobre ito”.

Why aren’t my enemies frustrated with this arbitration? “This can’t happen to me. It’s difficult because it’s getting more and more complicated because there are recurring things. “Hicimos un buen partido, sabemos que tenemos que luchar contra todos y lo seguiremos haciendo”.

Are you thinking about whether Selvin Brown was involved with Said Martínez of all people? “No it’s solo Selvin; there are different parts. In the semi-final we realized that we were anulan. No puedo hablar de los árbitros, hablen ustedes”.

Are you sure that you liquidated the Partido before Rubilio Castillo? “We think it’s good. Refresh yourself with the cancha mitade to warm up the pelota. It only took a few minutes to realize that it was necessary and that there was still time. Entraron bien los cambios”.

What was the reason why Agustín Auzmendi didn’t march to Olimpia wearing the Motagua jersey? “Ya lo habíamos hablado in front of the Ley de las Probabilidades. I had a difficult time and got a great blessing. I hope that it will continue near Domingo.”