Lindsay Clancy's trial is scheduled for December 1, 2025

HAPPENED. YES. BEN AND JESSICA, A TRIAL DATE IS NOW ON THE CALENDAR. DECEMBER 1, 2025. And that would have been almost three years ago. WHEN? SINCE THE THREE LITTLE CHILDREN WERE KILLED. THIS LATE AFTERNOON COURT HEARING WAS HELD TO SET A TRIAL DATE AND ALSO ADDRESS SOME OTHER LEGAL QUESTIONS. Both the prosecution and defense estimate the trial will last two to three weeks, including jury selection. LINDSAY CLANCY WILL GO ON TRIAL FOR MURDER IN THE strangulation of her three young children in DUXBURY IN JANUARY 2023. YOUR ATTORNEY plans to use a lack of criminal responsibility defense, also known as the insanity defense. HER LAWYER HAS ALREADY BROUGHT UP THE ISSUE OF POST PARTUMA DEPRESSION AND OVERMEDICATION IN CONNECTION WITH CLANCY’S MENTAL STATE. She remains in a hospital in Tewksbury. NOW THE PROSECUTORS HAVE BEEN FILED TODAY A NEW MOTION REQUESTING THE OWNER AND PUBLISHER OF NEW YORK MAGAZINE, AND A WRITER, TO PROVIDE AUDIO RECORDINGS OF INTERVIEWS FOR AN OCTOBER ARTICLE WITH PATRICK CLANCY, LINDSAY’S HUSBAND, AND THERE HANDED TO FATHER OF THE THREE VICTIMS. Prosecutors are also requesting that all emails, notes and text messages related to Clancy’s interview, as well as all interviews conducted for this article, be obtained again today. A TRI

Trial date set for Lindsay Clancy, Massachusetts mother charged with murder of three children

The trial is scheduled for December 1st

Less than a week after Lindsay Clancy’s defense team informed the court of their defense strategy, a court has set a date for her trial. Clancy is accused of strangling her three young children with exercise bands in 2023 before jumping out of a window at the family home. During a hearing on Wednesday, the court scheduled her trial for December 1. Lawyers for both sides said they expect the case could last two to three weeks. Last week, Clancy’s attorney filed a “Defendant’s Notice of Lack of Criminal Responsibility.” It states: “Now the defendant, Lindsay Clancy, in the matter signed above, pursuant to Rule 14(b)(B), the defendant’s statements as the defendant’s experts will rely on her state of mind, and the defendant intends to to present to the court a defense of lack of criminal responsibility for strangulation in the deaths of her 5-year-old daughter Cora, her 3-year-old son Dawson and her 7-month-old son Callan. Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington has previously claimed that Clancy suffered from postpartum depression and had taken excessive amounts of medication on the day of the murders. Prosecutors said she knew what she was doing when she sent her husband to pick up medicine and dinner and even considered how long the trip would take. In a recent interview with The New Yorker, Patrick Clancy said he once asked his wife for answers. On Wednesday, prosecutors asked the court to order the editor of The New Yorker to turn over notes and correspondence related to the article. “I think one of the first questions I asked was, ‘Did you plan this? Is that why you sent me out?’” Clancy told the magazine. “She said, ‘No, it was just a snap of her fingers.'” Under Massachusetts law, the defense only has to argue that Lindsay Clancy was not guilty by reason of insanity. NewsCenter 5’s legal experts said it will then be up to the state to prove Clancy was sane and criminally responsible the night her children were killed. Clancy is being held at Tewksbury State Hospital.

PLYMOUTH, Mass. –

Less than a week after Lindsay Clancy’s defense team informed the court of their defense strategy, a court has set a date for her trial.

Clancy is accused of strangling her three young children with exercise bands before jumping from a window of the family’s home in 2023.

During a hearing on Wednesday, the court scheduled her trial for December 1. Lawyers for both sides said they expect the case could last two to three weeks.

Last week, Clancy’s attorney filed a “Defendant’s Notice of Lack of Criminal Responsibility.”

It states: “Now, in the above matter, defendant Lindsay Clancy arrives pursuant to Rule 14(b)(B) that defendant’s expert witnesses will rely on defendant’s statements as to her state of mind and that defendant intends to do so.” to present to the court a defense of lack of criminal responsibility.”

Clancy was charged with three counts of murder and strangulation in connection with the deaths of her 5-year-old daughter Cora, 3-year-old son Dawson and 7-month-old son Callan.

Clancy’s attorney, Kevin Reddington, has previously claimed that Clancy was suffering from postpartum depression and had taken excessive amounts of medication on the day of the murders. Prosecutors said she knew what she was doing when she sent her husband to pick up medicine and dinner and even considered how long the trip would take.

In a recent interview with The New Yorker, Patrick Clancy said he once asked his wife for answers. On Wednesday, prosecutors asked the court to order the editor of The New Yorker to turn over notes and correspondence related to the article.

“I think one of the first questions I asked was, ‘Did you plan this? Is that why you sent me out?’” Clancy told the magazine. “She said, ‘No, it was just a snap of her fingers.'”

Under Massachusetts law, the defense must only argue that Lindsay Clancy was not guilty by reason of insanity. NewsCenter 5 legal experts said it will then be up to the state to prove Clancy was sane and criminally responsible the night her children were killed.

Clancy is being held at Tewksbury State Hospital.

Related Posts

Starting lineup Leverkusen vs. Inter Milan: Taremi & Frattesi there

Battle of the RBs: Barkley and Henry face a neck-and-neck race

Google’s AI weather forecast model is pretty darn good

Leave a Reply Cancel reply